our networks
tlcanimal planetthe science channel
site search
discovery storediscovery adventures
tlc
 
dinosaurs news

News — Dinosaurs


Cannibalistic Dinosaur Theory Debunked

small text
large text
Submit to:        

Sept. 26, 2006 — For a half-century a carnivorous dino called Coelophysis was believed to have a taste for juveniles of its own species. The idea — reiterated widely in museums, books and popular media — was based on two highly-touted 210-million-year-old Coelophysis fossils from New Mexico. These two fossils appeared to have bones of their own kind located where their stomachs used to be.

A new and closer examination of the bones, which are now located at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, has shown that one of these rare fossil dinos had actually died with a crocodile-like animal’s leg in its gut, while the other was merely buried atop a juvenile Coelophysis — giving the illusion that one was inside the other.

advertisement
line

"It was an idea that needed testing," said Sterling Nesbitt, one of four museum researchers to take on the task of reexamining the fossils. Nesbitt and his colleagues have reported their iconoclastic results in the journal Biology Letters.

"It was the only real good evidence we had that these animals were cannibalistic," said Nesbitt. But Nesbitt said he grew more suspicious just looking at bronze castings of the famed Coelophysis fossils on display at the 81st Street subway station near the museum.

"They are really well-done casts," he said. "I could tell right away that the femur didn’t belong to a dinosaur."

To prove it, the original fossils were brought out of their glass case, and Nesbitt and his colleagues took thin sections of the bones to study under the microscope. What they found were telltale growth lines — rather like tree rings — which indicated a slow-growing early crocodilian, not a faster-growing dinosaur.

In the second case the "eaten" juvenile turned out to be outside the ribcage of the larger Coelophysis, not in its stomach cavity. What’s more, the juvenile was also just too big to have been eaten without killing the larger dino in the process, said paleontologist Raymond Rogers of Macalester College, St. Paul, Minn., who has searched for dino cannibalism elsewhere.

The juvenile would have had to displace all the internal organs of the adult to have fit, said Rogers. The matter was even pointed out a few years ago by a skeptical geology undergraduate named Robert Gay, of Northern Arizona University, Rogers said.

      More
[ 1 . 2 ]
  next »




Get More from Discovery News:
Sun, 22 Nov 2009
Sun, 22 Nov 2009
Sun, 22 Nov 2009
Sat, 21 Nov 2009
Sat, 21 Nov 2009
Sat, 21 Nov 2009
Fri, 20 Nov 2009
Fri, 20 Nov 2009
Fri, 20 Nov 2009
Fri, 20 Nov 2009
 
send to a friend  printer friendly version
rss subscribe  podcast subscribe
Tarnished Reputation
Tarnished Reputation

broadband news

Get Video:

More News:


Main — Archive

Pictures: DCI | AMNH |
Source: Discovery News
Editor: Discovery News

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS

Discovery Channel | TLC | Animal Planet | Discovery Health | Science Channel | Planet Green
Discovery Kids | Military Channel | Investigation Discovery | HD Theater | Turbo | FitTV

HowStuffWorks | TreeHugger | Petfinder | PetVideo | Discovery Education

Visit the Discovery Store: Toys & Games | Telescopes | DVD Sets | Planet Earth DVD | Gift Ideas

By visiting this site, you agree to the terms and conditions
of our Visitor Agreement. Please read. Privacy Policy.
ATTENTION! We recently updated our privacy policy. The changes are effective as of September 10, 2008.
To see the new policy, click here. Questions? See the policy for the contact information.

Copyright © 2009 Discovery Communications, LLC.

The leading global real-world media and entertainment company.