Was Dinosaur Dominance Just Good Luck?

Sept. 12, 2008 -- The age of dinosaurs lasted more than 160 million years, but new research out Thursday suggests their dominance had less to do with their supposed physiological superiority and more to do with blind luck.

"For a long time it was thought there was something special about dinosaurs that helped them become more successful during the first 30 million years of their history, but this isn't true," said Steve Brusatte, a researcher at Columbia University in New York and co-author of the study.

"If any of us were there during the Triassic and asked which group would rule the world for the next 130 million years, we would have identified the crurotarsans, their competitors, whose descendants are crocodiles," he added.

At the end of the Triassic, around 200 million years ago, crurotarsans and dinosaurs were probably in competition for the same resources. Because dinosaurs survived such a long time they have were thought to have evolved faster and adapted better than their competitors.

But the new research, published today in the journal Science, suggests it was the crurotarsans who had the upper hand.

After studying nearly 500 skeletal characteristics from 64 species, researchers say that in terms of diversity of size, body types, diet, and lifestyle, crurotarsans had the evolutionary edge.

Compared with modern-day crocodiles, Triassic-era crurotarsans were surprisingly diverse. There were huge biped predators, and quadrupeds such as the Deinosuchus (meaning 'Terrible Crocodile') that ate herbivorous dinosaurs.