Europa Vs. Titan: NASA Narrows Quest for Life

Feb. 9, 2008 -- An ongoing debate among scientists looking for life beyond Earth asks whether NASA's next big adventure to the outer regions of the solar system should be to Saturn's moon Titan or Jupiter's Europa. Both are difficult places to get to, and both have become alluring targets in the quest to learn whether Earth alone supports life.

A meeting on Thursday between NASA's lead scientist Ed Weiler and his European counterpart David Southwood is expected to resolve the issue.

Watch a video of the top five reasons Europa is worth a visit.

A decision to explore Europa, which is widely believed to have liquid oceans beneath its frozen crust, likely would include a second spacecraft, built by Europe, riding piggyback. The European spacecraft would be dispatched for an independent mission to Ganymede, Jupiter's largest moon and one which also may have an ice-capped ocean.

The joint NASA-ESA Europa Jupiter System Mission also could include a lander provided by Russia, which is hosting a meeting this week to discuss technologies to probe the moon's subsurface oceans and assess conditions for life.

WATCH VIDEO: What's so special about Europa?

Related Content:

• Discovery Space: Does Europa Have an Icy Ocean?
• Discovery Space: Pinging Saturn's Moon Titan
• HowStuffWorks.com: Future NASA Projects
• More Discovery News

"We'll see if they're really serious about building this thing," astrobiologist Kevin Hand, with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., told Discovery News.

"Much of the reason why I'm here and my other NASA colleagues are here is to see what's on their agenda and to see how they are interested in moving forward with that agenda," said Hand, who is attending the European Lander Science Goals and Experiments Workshop conference hosted by the Space Research Institute in Moscow.

"There's a lot of great science if you could get to the surface," added Dave Senske, a JPL planetary scientist who led a NASA study team assessing Jupiter mission options.

With or without Russian participation, NASA and ESA plan to collaborate on a major initiative to the outer planets that would launch around 2020 and have a transit time of about six years. A mission to either Titan or Europa would cost between $2 billion and $3 billion.

In the meantime, missions to Mars -- a six-month voyage that can take place every two years -- will continue, though perhaps at a more modest clip. NASA, for example, passed up a launch opportunity this year because of technical concerns for its next Mars probe, a mobile chemistry lab that will be able to assess a region for life.

"Mars is closer and easier to get to," said JPL planetary scientist Brad Dalton. "There's a lot going on in our own solar system and a lot of chances to still find the possibility of life."

Looking beyond Mars, Titan has two main advantages over Europa: It has liquids on the surface, and it has a thick atmosphere that can be used to slow down a spacecraft and help put it into orbit.

The surface liquids, however, are believed to be mostly methane, which is not as conducive to life as liquid water. Titan's surface water is locked into the crust as ice, but scientists suspect there may be a subsurface ocean where water mingles with ammonia.