June 30, 2009 -- The world's longest fence stretches for 5,000 kilometers (more than 3,000 miles) from one side of southern Australia to another. The fence was designed to keep sheep-eating dingoes out of a third of the country, but the barrier has had some other surprising consequences. On the dingo-free side of the fence, according to a new study, overall biodiversity is actually lower than it is on the side where dingoes are free to roam. The research suggests that invasive predators, once they've established themselves, play an important role in the food web and might actually be good for conservation. The finding could affect efforts to both control and reintroduce predators in other parts of the world, too, including wolves in the western United States. "There's an idea that introduced predators are altogether bad and cause these catastrophic extinctions," said Mike Letnic, an ecologist at the University of Sydney in Australia. "Our results clearly show that this introduced predator species has a positive ecological role that is contrary to its classification as a pest." Dingoes were introduced to Australia 5,000 years ago and promptly replaced the Tasmanian Wolf, a marsupial, as top predator. From 1900 to the 1960s, the country built a six-foot tall wire fence through deserts and mountains, from the southern coast to the northeast of Brisbane, to keep the dogs away from sheep and other livestock. Since then, ecosystems on either side of the fence have diverged in striking ways. Related Content:
Some of those differences are obvious. There are noticeably more kangaroos, for example, inside the fence, where there are no dingoes, than there are outside the fence, where dingoes are plentiful and eager to eat the hopping marsupials. During his years out in the field, Letnic also noticed other, more intangible differences. "Something about areas with dingoes... felt totally different," he said. "I worked long enough as a naturalist to feel there was something significant going on." With his colleagues, Letnic spent two weeks surveying eight sites on both sides of the fence. Pairs of sites were located in similar landscapes. At each site, the researchers used traps, counted tracks and scat, and watched for animals, including dingoes, kangaroos, foxes, cats, rabbits and rodents. The scientists also looked at dung samples to see what animals from each group were eating. Get More NewsSpiders, Scorpions Among World's Oldest CreaturesMany creepy crawlies have been on Earth much longer than previously believed.Blood-Sucking Vampire Bats Sing DuetsWhite-winged vampire bats "harmonize" with separated roost mates.Oldest Hebrew Writing Possibly FoundAncient inscriptions on a 3,000-year-old pottery shard could make history.Rare, Prehistoric-Age Reptile Found in N.Z.A tuatara has been spotted on the New Zealand mainland for the first time in 200 years.Iceman Has No Living RelativesOetzi, the 5,300 year-old frozen mummy, left no living genetic legacy.SLIDE SHOW: Landscapes of TerrorWhat makes a place feel scary? There are scientific explanations.It's Official: People Are Warming the PolesHumans are conclusively to blame for polar warming, say scientists.Eight-Armed Animal Preceded DinosaursWhat may be one of Earth's first animals was no bigger than a coaster and had eight arms.Phoenicians Live on in People's GenesOne in 17 Mediterranean men may be descended from ancient Phoenicians.Pesticides, Fertilizers Linked to Frog DeclineA pesticide is found to promote parasites among amphibians.Hubble Telescope Taking Photos AgainThe Hubble Space Telescope is once again snapping stunning photos of the universe.Andean Mummy Hairs Show Hallucinogen UseScientists find direct evidence of hallucinogenic drug use among ancient Andeans.Opals on Mars Reveal Planet's Long Wet PastOpals found on Mars suggest the planet has been wet for much longer. |
advertisement
Top News Today20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
20 Nov
Put Discovery News on Your Site! |